Advanced Search

Special Report Info

The Russia Profile Special Report is a quarterly publication that consists of a collection of articles by different staff and freelance authors dedicated to a specific central theme of the editors' choosing. Stories found in our Special Reports are the best-researched, most profound and comprehensive analytical pieces available at RussiaProfile.Org.

The Special Reports are an indispensible tool for any Russia watcher or researcher interested in taking a closer look at the pressing issues that affect the modern Russian society. The reports are a derivative of the print version of our monthly magazine that is no longer published on paper, but is available in various digital formats for the convenience of our readers.

We welcome all feedback and suggestions from our readers, so if there is a specific topic you would like Russia Profile to take a closer look at, please let us know!

Add to Favorites Set as Homepage

Why I’m Voting for Putin

While Putin Campaign Videos Cause a Stir and Anti-Kremlin Spots Feature New Stars, Neither Will Be Particularly Effective Oleg Yankovsky's Artistic Breakthrough awards ceremony By Dan Peleschuk Russia Profile 02/16/2012

The Kremlin has launched a new pre-election campaign that consists of a series of videos featuring various celebrities and cultural icons explaining why they plan to vote for Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in the upcoming presidential contest. The series has already caused a scandal, and the opposition’s own video campaign and host of recognizable figures seem to pose a threat to the Kremlin’s new project. Yet experts argue that despite either side’s PR efforts, public opinion will remain mostly unchanged.

Posted on YouTube under the username “vote4putin,” the series of campaign ads – there are now nearly 40 of them – feature stars from across the gamut of notoriety, from National Hockey League star Ilya Kovalchuk and popular Russian rapper Timati, to crooner Stas Mikhailov and noted actor Armen Dzhigarkhanyan. Produced and sponsored by Putin’s 2012 presidential campaign, the ads are mostly sleek and adorned with a single tagline: “Why I’m voting for Putin.”

Besides the celebrities’ open support for Putin in the upcoming elections, several other themes unite their arguments. Among them is praise for Putin’s returning of Russia onto the world stage (“In America, everyone talks about it – Russia is now respected,” Kovalchuk said) and, strangely, fears of impending revolution (“I don’t want people throwing around Molotov cocktails and for tanks to roll into my town,” Timati noted.). Others, such as Mikhailov, opt for the time-tested “stability” line: “I want my kids to live in peace, stability in society, and for people to feel protected – that’s what I need.”

Yet the affair blew up in the Kremlin’s face on February 15, when media reports surfaced claiming that actress and children’s philanthropist Chulpan Khamatova was forced into appearing in one of the campaign’s videos. The founder of the Give Life Foundation, a charity that helps cancer-stricken children, Khamatova appeared jittery and nearly in tears in her video, while noting that Putin has attended to the needs of the fund and its doctors. “All the promises made by Vladimir Putin to the Give Life Foundation,” she said, visibly flustered, “have been fulfilled.” Anonymous sources told that Khamatova had been threatened with cuts in funding for the organization and its associated center for pediatric hematology.

But while analysts and bloggers traded opinions on the Khamatova affair in a frenzy of online activity, the general idea behind the video campaign, meanwhile, perhaps reveals the Kremlin’s latest tactic for attracting the pro-Putin votes it desperately needs on March 4. As the opposition movement grinds on, it seems to collect ever more new faces along the way. Including such recognizable commodities as famous crime novelist Boris Akunin, celebrated writer Lyudmila Ulitskaya, news reporter Leonid Parfyonov and perestroika rocker Yuri Shevchuk, among others, it is a movement that blends perhaps the most important faces of the intelligentsia.

Indeed, the civil society group Citizen Observer, set up to monitor the presidential vote across major Russian cities, released its own well-produced and savvy video recently, in which a slew of notables – including Ksenia Sobchak, Parfyonov and new media journalist Tikhon Dziadko – explained why they chose to be election monitors. It joins the ranks of anti-corruption blogger Alexei Navalny’s own monitoring project, RosVybory, which has also released a series of videos featuring rock star Andrei Makarevich and music critic Artemy Troitsky pushing viewers to sign up as observers.

But that, experts said, is just the thing: while recognizable to big-city elites and the educated middle class, such pop culture figures rarely resonate among the older population. And vice versa, according to analyst Pavel Salin, who argues that each video series with its “leaders of public opinion” – whether pro-Kremlin or opposition-minded – plays to its own crowd with little crossover. “Every such leader has his or her own audiences – those that support them and those that don’t,” he said. “Look at [veteran film director and Putin supporter] Nikita Mikhalkov: the patriotic faction of the population supports him tremendously, while the liberals don’t accept him at all – they find him repulsive.”

Others similarly noted that, by and large, the electorate made up its mind well in advance. Pointing out that only about 15 percent of voters were undecided at the end of January, Levada Center researcher Oleg Savelyev said the true shifts in opinion will only come as a result of “extraordinary circumstances:” “It would take some enormous natural or technological disaster, or probably an unfavorable action by the government akin to the Bloody Sunday of 1905,” he said. “But then again, no one expected a revolution of massive proportions then, either.”

  • add to blog

  • share

  • send to friend

  • print

Add to blog

You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.

Publication code:


Send by e-mail

Comment on this article as a registered user


Reader Comments


Fred Eidlin

It's too early to judge the effect of such videos. A continuing process was set in motion with the post-election demonstrations and the leadership's response. The direction and outcome of this process is probably at least as unpredictable as the electoral processes in most democratic countries--maybe more. In America we are familiar with situations where such things as a surprise primary victory, a candidate's gaffe, an upturn or downturn in the economy, smear tactics and reactions to such tactics can turn an election upside down. Why should an increasingly politicized Russian electorate, with increasingly meaningful choices, be qualitatively different? We still don't know how the opposition movement will develop, for example, whether it coalesce around a unified program and leadership, or spit into warring factions. We still don't know what surprises the leadership has up its sleeve. There have been plenty of surprises already. People may have made up their mind, but events may change their minds.